Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > So I've run this locally, and the following files are failing: > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.0/os/x86_64/RELEASE-NOTES-{it,ru,pt,fr,nl,es,ja,de,cz}.html > Yes, those are the files. > They all have newer timestamps on the main mirror, then the remaining > files in that directory. > Apparently someone has gone and changed them after the fact. And most > importantly after I generated the jigdo files. > > Does this mean the main directories contents can actually change after > release? If so... then that's bad. They shouldn't. These seem to have changed because of the charset fuckup with the release notes on the ISOs. But normally stuff in os/ shouldn't change after release. On another note: I was able to rebuild all other x86_64 CD isos and they do have the same checksums as the ISOs on the mirrors. And I asked dag to rebuild jigdo-0.7.3 for rpmforge, so it will be available for CentOS 5 also. More testing from me in the next few days, I have to go through the documentation first and that needs a little time. Cheers and thanks, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070419/64326fb1/attachment-0005.sig>