I want to volunteer if any benchmarking, testing or other help might be needed :D -- Best Regards, Ivan Levchenko levchenko.i at gmail.com On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > Gavin Carr wrote: >> >> What are you thinking of here Karanbir? Using the current C5 perl package >> (so 5.8.8) but with the upstream fixes applied? Or backporting the FC8 >> package? Or something more divergent from upstream (e.g. do we turn off >> ithreads)? > > I was hoping someone else would come up with that plan and take ownership of > it :D However, what I intend to do today is backport the fix's into the > latest version of perl already released into CentOS-5 so its available as an > interim fix. I am sure something will come down the line from upstream, and > when it does we can replace our interim fix with whatever does come down, > when it comes down. Stay tuned. > >> I assume we're not thinking of rebasing to 5.10, for instance? > > not me no. > > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >