Ned Slider wrote:
> I agree with Dag that solution providers shouldn't be able to sell it as
> CentOS if it clearly isn't because they've modified, disabled or removed
> key parts of the system.
ok, so lets be clear about one thing - no-one except CentOS.org can
distribute anything called 'CentOS'. Everything else is just 'derived
from, based on, using parts of, inspired from etc.
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net