Karanbir Singh wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >> I agree with Dag that solution providers shouldn't be able to sell it as >> CentOS if it clearly isn't because they've modified, disabled or removed >> key parts of the system. > > ok, so lets be clear about one thing - no-one except CentOS.org can > distribute anything called 'CentOS'. Everything else is just 'derived > from, based on, using parts of, inspired from etc. > Agreed - I think the gripes I see mainly stem from hosting providers selling solutions that are based on CentOS as CentOS... the /based on/ seems to get forgotten somewhere along the line. Their not distributing it, just selling a solution using it or based on it.