On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 21:31 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> seth vidal wrote: >>> On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 17:53 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >>>> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> So, the answer is in an x86_64 install you need to add .x86_64 to your >>>>> install commands. >>>> >>>> You want to update that bug report mentioned above? Or should I do that? >>>> Should that be closed as "Not a bug"? >>>> >>> >>> I've confirmed this on a box here - it's weird - the codepath should be >>> identical - I'm doing a bit more spelunking. >> >> Thank you. > > okay - it's fixed in 3.2.X in git - probably working in 3.2.16, too - > but not in 3.2.8. Could that be marked to become fixed as part of RHEL 5.3 ? -- -- dag wieers, dag at centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]