On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 23:29 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 21:31 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >> seth vidal wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 17:53 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >>>> Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>>>> So, the answer is in an x86_64 install you need to add .x86_64 to your > >>>>> install commands. > >>>> > >>>> You want to update that bug report mentioned above? Or should I do that? > >>>> Should that be closed as "Not a bug"? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I've confirmed this on a box here - it's weird - the codepath should be > >>> identical - I'm doing a bit more spelunking. > >> > >> Thank you. > > > > okay - it's fixed in 3.2.X in git - probably working in 3.2.16, too - > > but not in 3.2.8. > > Could that be marked to become fixed as part of RHEL 5.3 ? I think that's roughly in the plan but I'm not a rhel decider of any kind. -sv