Jeff Johnson wrote: > On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >> Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: >>> >>>> Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: >>>>> I'm not sure how this would be handled if the install was via yum. >>>>> Would freeradius be installed first, thus avoiding the errors? >>>>> >>>>> Is there a way to indicate which package should be installed >>>>> first? Is >>>>> it even worth it? >>>> Yes, you can influence the order. I expect you have >>>> >>>> Requires: freeradius >>>> >>>> for freeradius-libs in the .spec. If you replace that by >>>> >>>> PreReq: freeradius >>>> >>>> the freeradius RPM will get installed before freeradius-libs. >>>> You probably want to push this change upstream by creating a >>>> Bugzilla >>>> entry for Fedora ;) >>>> >>> This is not true for years. All requires are used for ordering, >>> prereq and requires are handled identically. >> Oh, sorry. My knowledge might be outdated... Still need to use >> Fedora Core 4 for development and here it still works. >> > > That isn't true for FC4 either. Its been almost a decade > since requires and prereq are handled identically. I'm not convinced on this point :-/ Pretty sure there is a difference when installing only two RPMs with changed Requires/PreReq. However I checked with rpm, not yum?! (yes, without loops) [this might get too much off-topic - we can leave it open like this] >>> All that adding prereq does is not ignore a dependency in a loop. >>> >>> If you have a loop, then you need to fix the loop, not pretend >>> that PreReq: does anything useful. >> Well, this mail wasn't about a loop. It's about ordering of packages >> where <package>-libs depends on a %pre-scriptlet of <package>. >> > > If there is *ANY* effect on ordering by switching to PreReq:, > its *ALL* about a loop. > >> Can you tell us the correct solutions for this problem? >> > > Not without verifying first that no loops are involved. > > Add -vv to an install or upgrade, confirm that there are no loops > involved > (you will see LOOP: ... messages) > > Otherwise, adding an additional dependency (use Requires: or PreReq: to > taste, they are synonyms) will change package install (but not erase, > that's a different problem) ordering. Ok. Thanks for explaining :) Niels -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090330/90bf5dec/attachment-0005.sig>