Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> [root at c5drbd1 drbd]# pwd ; ls -l >> /var/lib/drbd >> total 4 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 7 20:49 drbd-minor-0.conf -> /etc/drbd.conf >> >> Ralph : nothing listed in the mock/build log about that dir not listed >> in the %files section ? > > Building now. > > Ralph > > Ok, tested and now ok. I've also seen your mail on the DRBD mailling-list and the Lars' answer about the testing request (http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2009-May/012019.html). So the question is : do we want to provide both 8.2.7 (as drbd82 package) and 8.3.1 (as drbd83) ? It seems to me that drbd83 is 'just' an update to the 8.2.x branch (it could be named 8.2.10 in the Lars' answer) The reason why there was a drbd (for 7.0.24 on el4 and 8.0.6 on el5) and drbd82 was that metadata was not usable anymore and some config parameters were completely different and so a simple `yum update drbd` could break the existing setup. Now the question seems to be : do you still need to split between drbd82 and drbd83 ? -- -- Fabian Arrotin idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain` test -z "$idea" && echo "sorry, init 6 in progress" || sh ./answer.sh