Fabian Arrotin wrote: > So the question is : do we want to provide both 8.2.7 (as drbd82 > package) and 8.3.1 (as drbd83) ? It seems to me that drbd83 is 'just' an > update to the 8.2.x branch (it could be named 8.2.10 in the Lars' answer) > The reason why there was a drbd (for 7.0.24 on el4 and 8.0.6 on el5) and > drbd82 was that metadata was not usable anymore and some config > parameters were completely different and so a simple `yum update drbd` > could break the existing setup. No, that was not the reason (at least not for drbd82 on CentOS 5). <http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2795> and especially <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2008-May/009379.html> (Thread URGENT Request for DRBD Developers) on the drbd mailing list, it is split into several threads here: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2008-May/thread.html> > Now the question seems to be : do you still need to split between drbd82 > and drbd83 ? I don't really care, I also can work with a drbd83 only but I'm sure someone will begin yapping again. Problem is: The current git version does not build for me (I just gave it one shot, no debugging yet), I might try the git tag SuSE pulled out for SLES11. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090510/748ed3e2/attachment-0007.sig>