Karanbir Singh wrote: > Patrice Guay wrote: >> Creating to different LiveCD (official vs plus) does make sense. With >> the official LiveCD, you experience the equivalent CentOS release and >> see how your hardware is supported. > > This pretty much follows what I was thinking as well, with one > difference. Lets not call it 'official' and 'plus'. The 'plus' name is > good, since it would reflect on the state of the media well, however the > word 'official' is a bit misleading. Anything we put on > mirror.centos.org and announce publicly is 'official', wether its plus > or otherwise. Anyone have other recommendations for what it might be > called ? where it == livecd built from the distro only, using pkgs in > the distro only [1] > Core or Base maybe? Or just LiveCD and LiveCD-Plus (or whatever the "Plus" version is to be called)