Ned Slider wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Patrice Guay wrote: >>> Creating to different LiveCD (official vs plus) does make sense. With >>> the official LiveCD, you experience the equivalent CentOS release and >>> see how your hardware is supported. >> This pretty much follows what I was thinking as well, with one >> difference. Lets not call it 'official' and 'plus'. The 'plus' name is >> good, since it would reflect on the state of the media well, however the >> word 'official' is a bit misleading. Anything we put on >> mirror.centos.org and announce publicly is 'official', wether its plus >> or otherwise. Anyone have other recommendations for what it might be >> called ? where it == livecd built from the distro only, using pkgs in >> the distro only [1] >> > > Core or Base maybe? > > Or just LiveCD and LiveCD-Plus (or whatever the "Plus" version is to be > called) +1 to LiveCD vs LiveCD-Plus