[CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
Akemi Yagi
amyagi at gmail.comMon Dec 13 13:26:14 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Martin Jungowski <martin at rhm.de> wrote: > Another question just occurred to me: does this i686 limitation also > apply to RHEL5? > > Thanks, > Martin As I wrote to you in the Forum thread[1], RHEL-4 and RHEL-5 provide no support for i586. Akemi / toracat [1] http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=29278&forum=37
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list