[CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
Martin Jungowski
martin at rhm.deMon Dec 13 13:47:03 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:26:14 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote: > As I wrote to you in the Forum thread[1], RHEL-4 and RHEL-5 provide no > support for i586. > > Akemi / toracat Right, I forgot. Thanks again. Martin -- Rieke Computersysteme GmbH Hellerholz 5 D-82061 Neuried Email: martin[at]rhm[dot]de
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list