[CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
Fabian Arrotin
fabian.arrotin at arrfab.netFri Nov 26 19:27:03 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 11/26/2010 07:19 PM, David Hrbá?? wrote: >> I'd stick with bugzilla instance. >> - upstream provides updates for abrt<->bz integration >> - it's working now, we need only bz instance Well, a second reading on David's post leads me to the conclusion that he wanted to report to bugzilla, but not upstream :-) >> - no need for someone to track upstream and implement changes downstream > > Not entire sure if upstream would be happy to have that in, and once we > release something - its quite hard to completely remove it from the wild. > > I guess its a question we can ask > If we could only redirect to something like bugzilla.centos.org (for the abrt stuff) instead of upstream's bugzilla, that would be fine. There would still be a process of sorting real bugs from that bz instance and report them in mantis and/or upstream too :/ -- -- Fabian Arrotin
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list