[CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
David Hrbáč
hrbac.conf at seznam.czFri Nov 26 19:41:48 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dne 26.11.2010 20:27, Fabian Arrotin napsal(a): > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 11/26/2010 07:19 PM, David Hrbá?? wrote: >>> I'd stick with bugzilla instance. >>> - upstream provides updates for abrt<->bz integration >>> - it's working now, we need only bz instance Right. > > Well, a second reading on David's post leads me to the conclusion that > he wanted to report to bugzilla, but not upstream :-) > >>> - no need for someone to track upstream and implement changes downstream I mean, once we are going to pluging/rewrite, we need someone to track abrt upstream and propagate them into downstream/centos plugin. Also there will be work with mantis upstream down to... > If we could only redirect to something like bugzilla.centos.org (for the > abrt stuff) instead of upstream's bugzilla, that would be fine. There > would still be a process of sorting real bugs from that bz instance and > report them in mantis and/or upstream too :/ > Right. DH
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list