[CentOS-devel] glibc x86_64 vs. i686 file conflict when building from sources

Thu Nov 25 13:44:07 UTC 2010
Sergio Rubio <sergio at rubio.name>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Leonard den Ottolander <
leonard at den.ottolander.nl> wrote:

> Hello Sergio,
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 12:50 +0100, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> > If you could share the mock config used after that, If'd greatly
> > appreciate it.
> I'm using the epel-6-x86_64 and epel-6-i386 configs from the rebuilt
> Fedora 14 1.1.6-1 srpm - you need pigz from Fedora too -, enabling the
> beta and beta-optional repos. (Some of the devel packages are only
> available in beta-optional.) To this I added a local repo
> "updates" (using a file:// baseurl) - I commented out the default
> "updates" repo to avoid naming conflicts but you could use a different
> name instead - to which I copy the resulting rpms. This way the build
> roots automatically get updated with the fresh rpms after an invocation
> of
> $ creatrepo .
> in the repo directory and a subsequent mock rebuild.
> Since binutils didn't need an update going from 6beta to 6 I currently
> only have the mock roots patched with the glibc-2.12-1.7.el6 and related
> rpms. Next I will be adding the gcc-4.4.4-13.el6 and related rpms so
> subsequent packages will be build with the new compiler.

Thanks for the input. Greatly appreciated.

I'm using a similar strategy, though my mock is older. I'll give it a try.


> Regards,
> Leonard.
> --
> mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

FrameOS Linux
website: http://www.frameos.org <http://www.frameos.org>
twitter:   @rubiojr
blog:      http://blog.frameos.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20101125/89b1f923/attachment-0005.html>