[CentOS-devel] glibc x86_64 vs. i686 file conflict when building from sources

Thu Nov 25 16:10:49 UTC 2010
Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com>

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Sergio Rubio wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Leonard den Ottolander <
> leonard at den.ottolander.nl> wrote:
>> Hello Sergio,
>> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 12:50 +0100, Sergio Rubio wrote:
>>> If you could share the mock config used after that, If'd greatly
>>> appreciate it.
>> I'm using the epel-6-x86_64 and epel-6-i386 configs from the rebuilt
>> Fedora 14 1.1.6-1 srpm - you need pigz from Fedora too -, enabling the
>> beta and beta-optional repos. (Some of the devel packages are only
>> available in beta-optional.) To this I added a local repo
>> "updates" (using a file:// baseurl) - I commented out the default
>> "updates" repo to avoid naming conflicts but you could use a different
>> name instead - to which I copy the resulting rpms. This way the build
>> roots automatically get updated with the fresh rpms after an invocation
>> of
>> $ creatrepo .
>> in the repo directory and a subsequent mock rebuild.
>> Since binutils didn't need an update going from 6beta to 6 I currently
>> only have the mock roots patched with the glibc-2.12-1.7.el6 and related
>> rpms. Next I will be adding the gcc-4.4.4-13.el6 and related rpms so
>> subsequent packages will be build with the new compiler.
> Thanks for the input. Greatly appreciated.
> I'm using a similar strategy, though my mock is older. I'll give it a try.

RPMforge provides working mock packages for RHEL5 and RHEL6. Those 
packages can be found at:


Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/

[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]