On 11/26/2010 07:38 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> Which basicly means the thread was fine, until you got fed up with where >>> it was going. Not sure why me mentioning the mock builds triggered you. > I actually did, in fact I have read all the emails and usually refrain > from replying when I have an opinion (given my past). I suggest you read it again, because your 'which basicly means' is incorrect. >> Or you should stop feeling so insecure and thinking everyone is out to >> get you. I've almost always made requests to maintain sanity, not only >> on this list but plenty of other places as well. > > I guess that's matter of opinion. The availability of recent mock packages > for CentOS fits the centos-devel bill, just as the availability of > kmod-packages for CentOS belongs on the general centos mailinglist. Thats just bollocks. If every project was to announce every package in the main list, were looking at thousands of announcements there. You were repremanded after repeated spamming, not when you announced the efforts. And I am confident that we have been consistent with that policy over the years. Quite a few people have announced efforts and points of interest, its only when they digress into spamming have people objected. - KB