On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 11/26/2010 07:38 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>>> Which basicly means the thread was fine, until you got fed up with where >>>> it was going. Not sure why me mentioning the mock builds triggered you. >> I actually did, in fact I have read all the emails and usually refrain >> from replying when I have an opinion (given my past). > > I suggest you read it again, because your 'which basicly means' is > incorrect. As you stated yourself, you are being pedantic. And I think you are deliberately making this thread more worse than it should be. >>> Or you should stop feeling so insecure and thinking everyone is out to >>> get you. I've almost always made requests to maintain sanity, not only >>> on this list but plenty of other places as well. >> >> I guess that's matter of opinion. The availability of recent mock packages >> for CentOS fits the centos-devel bill, just as the availability of >> kmod-packages for CentOS belongs on the general centos mailinglist. > > Thats just bollocks. If every project was to announce every package in > the main list, were looking at thousands of announcements there. You > were repremanded after repeated spamming, not when you announced the > efforts. And I am confident that we have been consistent with that > policy over the years. Quite a few people have announced efforts and > points of interest, its only when they digress into spamming have people > objected. Explain to me how sending two mails to find users to test, is "repeated spamming" ? And while you know better, you can't resist the urge to disinform. I do think the problem is the content, as much as you don't like me mentioning we have alternative kmod-drbd packages (that actualy get updated frequently), you don't like others to discuss transparancy wrt. the build process or alternatives. Well, this is the Internet, get used to it. -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]