On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > Personally, I don't see the point of having anything in a > CentOS-specific repo that would be equally usable on RHEL, SL, etc., and > having it there will set up a likely conflict with an EPEL or Rpmforge > version unless they are maintained in sync. Things that use the extra > features of the centosplus kernel would be an obvious exception and > there are probably others. I would even vote for not picking up anything other than what upstream is doing. I much rather have more timely releases and updates, fastrack, and maybe other RHN channels (eg. EAL), than using those resources for extracurricular activities like DRBD packages, a centosplus kernel, etc... ELRepo is pretty much the place nowadays for additional kernel modules, kernel functionality and kernels. And there's RPMforge and EPEL that allow contributions. -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]