On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> Personally, I don't see the point of having anything in a >> CentOS-specific repo that would be equally usable on RHEL, SL, etc., and >> having it there will set up a likely conflict with an EPEL or Rpmforge >> version unless they are maintained in sync. Things that use the extra >> features of the centosplus kernel would be an obvious exception and >> there are probably others. > > I would even vote for not picking up anything other than what upstream is > doing. I much rather have more timely releases and updates, fastrack, and > maybe other RHN channels (eg. EAL), than using those resources for > extracurricular activities like DRBD packages, a centosplus kernel, etc... +1 Diversify only if you have the resources. Or, if you can bring them on-board if you don't have them. jerry