Le 20/02/11 04:32, Dag Wieers a écrit : > On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> For the vast majority of packages, we make no changes. We rebuild it >> and test it. If the binary passes the test, we use it. If the binary >> does not pass the test we troubleshoot and figure out why it does not >> pass the test ... and we change things OUTSIDE the SRPM to fix the >> problem. > Yes, and those changes are closed. > > But then again we first have to establish the notion that a CentOS release > that is 2 or 3 months behind RHEL is a huge security problem to CentOS > users (and probably to the CentOS infrastructure as well). > > I don't think it makes any sense to discuss the CentOS project's > transparency if we cannot admit that we are doing a lousy job regarding > our core business. The lack of competition in this space surely didn't > help keeping us on our toes. > Hello, So, if for some reasons I want to rebuild a centos (for educational); It will not work because of missing "hack" never published? Regards js.