On 02/20/2011 06:16 AM, js wrote: > Le 20/02/11 04:32, Dag Wieers a écrit : >> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> For the vast majority of packages, we make no changes. We rebuild it >>> and test it. If the binary passes the test, we use it. If the binary >>> does not pass the test we troubleshoot and figure out why it does not >>> pass the test ... and we change things OUTSIDE the SRPM to fix the >>> problem. >> Yes, and those changes are closed. >> >> But then again we first have to establish the notion that a CentOS release >> that is 2 or 3 months behind RHEL is a huge security problem to CentOS >> users (and probably to the CentOS infrastructure as well). >> >> I don't think it makes any sense to discuss the CentOS project's >> transparency if we cannot admit that we are doing a lousy job regarding >> our core business. The lack of competition in this space surely didn't >> help keeping us on our toes. >> > Hello, > > So, if for some reasons I want to rebuild a centos (for educational); It > will not work because of > missing "hack" never published? no, it will work once the person who wants to do the rebuild follows the instructions already published and uses the device named "brain".