Fellows, Karanbir just answered what we all wanted to know. There are no reasons to keep this stupid conversation/fight. 2011/2/17 jean-seb <jsh at interlug.net> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > theses words are just stupid (sorry, but I'm bored to read stuff like > that "if you're unhappy, buy RH and Shut up"): > > Ok, so that mean Centos is just a sand box and they should indicate in > the web site: > "Warning, This projet is just for fun, do not use for production" ???? > You cannot, in a side be "an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution" (see > http://www.centos.org/) and > in the other side said "take source and build your own"; > It's important to be coherent .... > So if Centos cannot be reactive about security update ... remove the > "Enterprise-class" from the web site > and be clear about that. > > Regards, > > js. > > > > Le 17/02/2011 18:20, dsieme01 at yahoo.com a écrit : > > You are free to take source and build your own package or buy redhat, > oracle or other. Beating up Volunteers will not serve the community. > > > > We owe the community for their work, not the other way around. > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone, powered by Cricket. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> > > Sender: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org > > Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:13:35 > > To: The CentOS developers mailing list.<centos-devel at centos.org> > > Reply-To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org > > > > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] progress? > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote: > >> > >> I, for one, do not think it is normal existing user's security is 2 or 3 > >> months at stake. > > > > +1 > > > > regards/ldv/vaden at texoma.net > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iD8DBQFNXTHpu8lcDdFEGbYRAkOJAJ9KqWIdNp2ohDG7MKfHC88iXacBEgCfZhsr > qUIfqWDx5PYNv3EA4YkTDMk= > =3Fk8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Taimur Gibran Rabuske Kuntz Researcher at Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuits Research Unit INESC-ID - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - Investigação e Desenvolvimento Lisbon - Portugal ----------------------------------------------------- GPG keyID: D4D0FEB8 @ pgp.mit.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110217/fa62da0c/attachment-0007.html>