[CentOS-devel] progress?

Thu Feb 17 14:37:24 UTC 2011
Taimur Gibran <taimurgibran at gmail.com>

Fellows, Karanbir just answered what we all wanted to know. There are no
reasons to keep this stupid conversation/fight.

2011/2/17 jean-seb <jsh at interlug.net>

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> theses words are just stupid (sorry, but I'm bored to read stuff like
> that "if you're unhappy, buy RH and Shut up"):
>
> Ok, so that mean Centos is just a sand box and they should indicate in
> the web site:
> "Warning, This projet is just for fun, do not use for production" ????
> You cannot, in a side be "an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution" (see
> http://www.centos.org/) and
> in the other side said "take source and build your own";
> It's important to be coherent ....
> So if Centos cannot be reactive about security update ... remove the
> "Enterprise-class" from the web site
> and be clear about that.
>
> Regards,
>
> js.
>
>
>
> Le 17/02/2011 18:20, dsieme01 at yahoo.com a écrit :
> > You are free to take source and build your own package or buy redhat,
> oracle or other. Beating up Volunteers will not serve the community.
> >
> > We owe the community for their work, not the other way around.
> >
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone, powered by Cricket.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net>
> > Sender: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
> > Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:13:35
> > To: The CentOS developers mailing list.<centos-devel at centos.org>
> > Reply-To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] progress?
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I, for one, do not think it is normal existing user's security is 2 or 3
> >> months at stake.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > regards/ldv/vaden at texoma.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > CentOS-devel at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > CentOS-devel at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iD8DBQFNXTHpu8lcDdFEGbYRAkOJAJ9KqWIdNp2ohDG7MKfHC88iXacBEgCfZhsr
> qUIfqWDx5PYNv3EA4YkTDMk=
> =3Fk8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>



-- 
Taimur Gibran Rabuske Kuntz
Researcher at Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuits Research Unit
INESC-ID - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - Investigação
e Desenvolvimento
Lisbon - Portugal
-----------------------------------------------------
GPG keyID: D4D0FEB8 @ pgp.mit.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110217/fa62da0c/attachment-0007.html>