+1 on your response, Taimur. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Taimur Gibran <taimurgibran at gmail.com>wrote: > Fellows, Karanbir just answered what we all wanted to know. There are no > reasons to keep this stupid conversation/fight. > > 2011/2/17 jean-seb <jsh at interlug.net> > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello, >> >> theses words are just stupid (sorry, but I'm bored to read stuff like >> that "if you're unhappy, buy RH and Shut up"): >> >> Ok, so that mean Centos is just a sand box and they should indicate in >> the web site: >> "Warning, This projet is just for fun, do not use for production" ???? >> You cannot, in a side be "an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution" (see >> http://www.centos.org/) and >> in the other side said "take source and build your own"; >> It's important to be coherent .... >> So if Centos cannot be reactive about security update ... remove the >> "Enterprise-class" from the web site >> and be clear about that. >> >> Regards, >> >> js. >> >> >> >> Le 17/02/2011 18:20, dsieme01 at yahoo.com a écrit : >> > You are free to take source and build your own package or buy redhat, >> oracle or other. Beating up Volunteers will not serve the community. >> > >> > We owe the community for their work, not the other way around. >> > >> > >> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone, powered by Cricket. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> >> > Sender: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org >> > Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:13:35 >> > To: The CentOS developers mailing list.<centos-devel at centos.org> >> > Reply-To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." < >> centos-devel at centos.org> >> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] progress? >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I, for one, do not think it is normal existing user's security is 2 or >> 3 >> >> months at stake. >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > regards/ldv/vaden at texoma.net >> > _______________________________________________ >> > CentOS-devel mailing list >> > CentOS-devel at centos.org >> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> > _______________________________________________ >> > CentOS-devel mailing list >> > CentOS-devel at centos.org >> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> > >> > >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iD8DBQFNXTHpu8lcDdFEGbYRAkOJAJ9KqWIdNp2ohDG7MKfHC88iXacBEgCfZhsr >> qUIfqWDx5PYNv3EA4YkTDMk= >> =3Fk8 >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> > > > > -- > Taimur Gibran Rabuske Kuntz > Researcher at Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuits Research Unit > INESC-ID - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - > Investigação e Desenvolvimento > Lisbon - Portugal > ----------------------------------------------------- > GPG keyID: D4D0FEB8 @ pgp.mit.edu > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110217/e235dc2a/attachment-0007.html>