On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jerry Amundson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq at mac.com> wrote: >> On Feb 21, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:44 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >>>> libuser-0.52.5-1.1.el4_8.1.src.rpm >>>> (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html), >>> >>> The correct SRPM for 5 being: libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.src.rpm , >>> CentOS-4 actually is up to date wrt this update. >>> >> >> Updates for both RHEL and CentOS are dead fish in a barrel on the web. > > Yes, clearly the intent is to distract list members from the key > issues of the thread. "Look, over there, dead fish in a barrel. > Research them, and report back with your findings." :-) > A web-page comparing the current differences between RHEL <-> CentOS is more informative and more useful (and likely more accurate, no additional e-mail straightening out which krb5 version it _REALLY_ was) than the current traffic through e-mail. I have no clear intents, give it up. 73 de Jeff -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4645 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110221/438a6bfc/attachment-0007.p7s>