On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq at mac.com> wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jerry Amundson wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq at mac.com> wrote: >>> On Feb 21, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:44 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >>>>> libuser-0.52.5-1.1.el4_8.1.src.rpm >>>>> (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html), >>>> >>>> The correct SRPM for 5 being: libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.src.rpm , >>>> CentOS-4 actually is up to date wrt this update. >>>> >>> >>> Updates for both RHEL and CentOS are dead fish in a barrel on the web. >> >> Yes, clearly the intent is to distract list members from the key >> issues of the thread. "Look, over there, dead fish in a barrel. >> Research them, and report back with your findings." :-) >> > > A web-page comparing the current differences between RHEL <-> CentOS > is more informative and more useful (and likely more accurate, > no additional e-mail straightening out which krb5 version it _REALLY_ > was) than the current traffic through e-mail. > > I have no clear intents, give it up. Sorry, lazy wording on my part - my context wasn't directed toward you, it was directed towards KB playing the "what are these critical security updates you speak of ?" card. I just also liked the dead fish in a barrel "visual". :-) jerry