On 02/24/2011 11:23 AM, Antaryami Khuda wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org > <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote: > > On 02/24/2011 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > On 2/24/2011 10:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> > >> And Les ... no, this is NOT easy to do. > >> > > > > Which makes it seem like you'd want to attract additional > resources that > > might be able to help. That's the part I'm missing, not the > difficulty > > or time/resource consuming nature of the problem. > > > We have released everything that we do ... I am not understanding the > problem here. > > We released the script we use to check the built RPMS, we released > examples of the mock files, we released the ISO and Distro build script, > we released the version of software we use on the builders (centos-5, > up2date), we even released a list of all the hidden build requirements. > There is NOTHING closed. There is NOTHING that someone can't grab and > start working on the problem if they want to do so. > > > Specifically where is all this released? I have looked, I see only a > tmrpmverify from 2007. > > Ant. http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/buildsystem/ http://mirror.centos.org/centos-4/4/build/distro/ http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-February/106570.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110224/8808b8c9/attachment-0007.sig>