[CentOS-devel] are there any chances to see finished CentOS6 in 2011?

The thread has become acrid and non-productive. Maybe start the thread
again, only this time without a subject line that implies incompetence and
laziness.

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Timo Schoeler
<timo.schoeler at riscworks.net>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Garry.Dale wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> <snip>
> >> ...and currently everything depend on one single
> >> man. that's the main reason why it's takes many months.
> >
> >
> > Is it possilble to declare this thread officially ridiculous?  And shut
> it
> > down?
> >
> > gd
>
> Why is it ridiculous? Different people asked what facts there might be
> against opening the development process of CentOS, and mainly those
> questions where based on the fact that people wanted to *help*. That was
> their intention.
>
> It was not whining about "when is bla available" etc, like the usual
> stuff. So, basically, it was a bunch of *valid* questions.
>
> However, all that was replied was "it's never gonna happen" (to be more
> open) -- why not? -- and "give me 90k GBP and all will be fine" -- what
> for, salary? Why not purchasing a RHEL license, then?
>
> This was inadequate pseudo answers.
>
> This sounds more like a discussion of a sect or cult than a mailing list
> of 'the *C*ommunity *ENT*erprise OS. Sorry, but that's more than
> evident, see the list archive if needed.
>
> Timo
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iD8DBQFNJMXwO/2mgkVVV7kRAgJzAJ0YboC6ThJFoZb2CmwJYHNh0PA6kgCfUVMe
> l1q8srI1jpeCbyjsKjjXOqo=
> =EBi6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110105/595e524b/attachment-0003.html>