On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 19:48 +0000, Ned Slider wrote: > > +100 to that. > > To me it is fairly evident that the website content isn't maintained on > any sort of regular basis hence the current rot. The website might as > well be a (fairly) static landing site pointing to things like downloads > of the latest release, the Wiki, the forums, the mailing lists, the IRC > channels etc where the active community actually resides. IMHO the Wiki > largely replaces the need for any CMS. I'm starting to give more and more importance to this idea. Also we can easily maintain such website through a git repository where contributors can push the changes directly to the code preventing any issue with LDAP and cms-ldap integration. The combos static website (HTML/CSS etc), phpbb and the existing wiki / mailing lists can make a clean and nice alternative to our original idea of setting up a cms. Andrea