Hi all. >> +100 to that. >> >> To me it is fairly evident that the website content isn't maintained on >> any sort of regular basis hence the current rot. The website might as >> well be a (fairly) static landing site pointing to things like downloads >> of the latest release, the Wiki, the forums, the mailing lists, the IRC >> channels etc where the active community actually resides. IMHO the Wiki >> largely replaces the need for any CMS. > > I'm starting to give more and more importance to this idea. Also we can > easily maintain such website through a git repository where contributors > can push the changes directly to the code preventing any issue with LDAP > and cms-ldap integration. > > The combos static website (HTML/CSS etc), phpbb and the existing wiki / > mailing lists can make a clean and nice alternative to our original idea > of setting up a cms. But again leads to the demand of a LDAP user management solution. Greets Marcus