[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?

On 03/23/2011 11:48 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:43:53AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
>>
>> Both statements says the same with different words ... SL says
>> "compatible" too, like CentOS ...
>
> 	Honestly... This is a development list.  If you need to have the
> 	concept of binary compatibility explained to you then I fear you
> 	are in the wrong place.
>
>

Honestly ... I know the meaning of the concept of "binary compatible". I 
don't understand is where you see the difference between CentOS and SL 
about this. Where is the difference?

-- 
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com