[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?

2011/3/23 carlopmart <carlopmart at gmail.com>:
> On 03/23/2011 11:48 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:43:53AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
>>>
>>> Both statements says the same with different words ... SL says
>>> "compatible" too, like CentOS ...
>>
>>       Honestly... This is a development list.  If you need to have the
>>       concept of binary compatibility explained to you then I fear you
>>       are in the wrong place.
>>
>>
>
> Honestly ... I know the meaning of the concept of "binary compatible". I
> don't understand is where you see the difference between CentOS and SL
> about this. Where is the difference?

carlopmart, please go to the -users list with this, one of the CentOS
devs actually posted a relevant example of the SL/CentOS differences
earlier today:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-March/108389.html

Best regards
Kenni