[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Nico Kadel-Garcia
nkadel at gmail.comThu Mar 24 02:12:09 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2011/3/23 Устинов Александр Александрович <rusfearuth at gmail.com>: > SL has extra packages (it means they wasn't included into RHEL) that was > included in it. > ... we have added several packages to Scientific Linux that are not found > anywhere in the upstream release, including IceWM, OpenAFS, Revisor, Live > USB Creator, YUM auto-update, external YUM repositories... (c) > from http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06549 > SL and CentOS like two people that go different ways, but have the common > base. > Kind regards, > Alexander Ustinov Can those packages go in a separate channel, much as "centosplus" is a separate channel? I don't have the spare environments to really spin that distribution up right now for the side by side comparison.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list