[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Rainer Traut
tr.ml at gmx.deThu Mar 24 08:31:36 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 23.03.2011 11:42, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant: > On 03/23/2011 12:20 PM, Rainer Traut wrote: >> Am 23.03.2011 11:09, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant: >>> if you examine certain packages you will notice that there are linking >>> differences between what SL ships and what RH ships. >> Can you give an example of such package/binary? > I can but I am not sure that I may. So I won't. So this means you are making assertions you cannot prove - for whatever reason. I cannot take you serious then.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list