[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Simon Matter
simon.matter at invoca.chThu Mar 24 08:40:19 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Am 23.03.2011 11:42, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant: >> On 03/23/2011 12:20 PM, Rainer Traut wrote: >>> Am 23.03.2011 11:09, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant: >>>> if you examine certain packages you will notice that there are linking >>>> differences between what SL ships and what RH ships. >>> Can you give an example of such package/binary? >> I can but I am not sure that I may. So I won't. > > So this means you are making assertions you cannot prove - for whatever > reason. I cannot take you serious then. Go to the centos list archives and look things up yourself, this has been discussed there recently.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list