[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Dag Wieers
dag at wieers.comThu Mar 24 09:07:37 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 03/23/2011 12:20 PM, Rainer Traut wrote: >> Am 23.03.2011 11:09, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant: >>> if you examine certain packages you will notice that there are linking >>> differences between what SL ships and what RH ships. >> Can you give an example of such package/binary? > I can but I am not sure that I may. So I won't. Manuel, I don't see any reason why you may not share incompatibilities found in Scientific Linux ? Can you shed a light on why that is ? Other team members already disclosed two of those, so is there a reason why not all of them are shared with the Scientific Linux team ? -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list