On 08/08/2012 08:09 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > SMF was rejected a long time ago on the basis of the license not being > friendly. Please check back in the archives or refer to the matrix here: > > http://wiki.centos.org/WebsiteVer2/forums > smf ver2 is BSD licensed. Would that not be acceptable ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc