On 08/08/12 20:41, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 08/08/2012 08:09 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> SMF was rejected a long time ago on the basis of the license not being >> friendly. Please check back in the archives or refer to the matrix here: >> >> http://wiki.centos.org/WebsiteVer2/forums >> > > smf ver2 is BSD licensed. Would that not be acceptable ? > Why are you asking me? I didn't impose the restrictions on licensing. I couldn't care less what license the forum software uses as long as it's the best software for the job. I'd choose vBulletin if it were up to me. But I understand if others have a desire to use open source software. So to answer your question, yes a BSD license is acceptable to me. But it's not my project. If you have re-evaluated the restrictions on licensing and come to some other conclusions since that work was done then please do let us know :-)