[CentOS-devel] CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers?

[Manuel Wolfshant]

On 02/27/2012 01:37 AM, Thomas Göttgens wrote:
> Guten Tag Manuel,
>
> you threw in a 686 kernel at the 3rd prompt :-) - Still the numbers
> differ from the OP...
On purpose. Results taken from a different machine with different arch. 
The original poster used results for 32 bits and I wanted to rule out 
smtg specific to a particular arch.


> [root at pegasus ~]# awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>     6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>     3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>
>> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>>      6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>      3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>>      6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>      3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> [root at DB ~]#  awk '{print $4;}'
>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>>      6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>      3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>


-- 
      Manuel Wolfshant       linux registered user #131416
         IT manager    NoBug Consulting SRL
   A: Yes.
   >Q: Are you sure?
   >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
   >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?