[CentOS-devel] CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers?

[Thomas Jacob]

Sorry for not mentioning that on the list also, but there is no bug,
the whole thing was related to a corrupted file on my
system, cf. http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5550


On Feb 27, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:

> On 02/27/2012 01:37 AM, Thomas Göttgens wrote:
>> Guten Tag Manuel,
>> 
>> you threw in a 686 kernel at the 3rd prompt :-) - Still the numbers
>> differ from the OP...
> On purpose. Results taken from a different machine with different arch. 
> The original poster used results for 32 bits and I wanted to rule out 
> smtg specific to a particular arch.
> 
> 
>> [root at pegasus ~]# awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>>    6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>    3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> 
>>> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>>>     6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>>     3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>>>     6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>>     3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>> [root at DB ~]#  awk '{print $4;}'
>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>>>     6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>>     3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>      Manuel Wolfshant       linux registered user #131416
>         IT manager    NoBug Consulting SRL
>   A: Yes.
>> Q: Are you sure?
>>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel