On 02/27/2012 01:37 AM, Thomas Göttgens wrote: > Guten Tag Manuel, > > you threw in a 686 kernel at the 3rd prompt :-) - Still the numbers > differ from the OP... On purpose. Results taken from a different machine with different arch. The original poster used results for 32 bits and I wanted to rule out smtg specific to a particular arch. > [root at pegasus ~]# awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c > 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL > 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL > >> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' >> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c >> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL >> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' >> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c >> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL >> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >> [root at DB ~]# awk '{print $4;}' >> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c >> 6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL >> 3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -- Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416 IT manager NoBug Consulting SRL A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?