Sorry for not mentioning that on the list also, but there is no bug, the whole thing was related to a corrupted file on my system, cf. http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5550 On Feb 27, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 02/27/2012 01:37 AM, Thomas Göttgens wrote: >> Guten Tag Manuel, >> >> you threw in a 686 kernel at the 3rd prompt :-) - Still the numbers >> differ from the OP... > On purpose. Results taken from a different machine with different arch. > The original poster used results for 32 bits and I wanted to rule out > smtg specific to a particular arch. > > >> [root at pegasus ~]# awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c >> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL >> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >> >>> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' >>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c >>> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL >>> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >>> [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' >>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c >>> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL >>> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >>> [root at DB ~]# awk '{print $4;}' >>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c >>> 6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL >>> 3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-devel mailing list >>> CentOS-devel at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> >> > > > -- > Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416 > IT manager NoBug Consulting SRL > A: Yes. >> Q: Are you sure? >>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel