[CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Jan 20 18:37:13 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office at plnet.rs> wrote: > > I would like to stay as close as possible to CentOS name, because it > practically is CentOS, with third-party repositories enabled. Intention > is to provide easily installable packages from various repositories, but > I have no desire to make it into developing distro, just a bunch of > carefully chosen and above all as stable as possible packages sitting on > top of the CentOS (with as little as possible replaced packages) that > will attract Desktop users wanting stability above all, but not > knowledgeable enough to decide what package from what repository they > are to chose. Why bother spinning an install for that? A repository-release file and list of packages or group for yum should work on top of a standard install. I've always thought there should be some standard/easy way for anyone to publish a set suitable for some particular use, but I don't think it really exists. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list