[CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
Jeff Sheltren
jeff at tag1consulting.comFri Sep 14 15:49:26 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > If EPEL were to tag their RPM packages such that the package ownership > is perfectly clear I would vote for (1). Unfortunately EPEL declines > to tag their packages, so my vote is thus (3). I think this has nothing to do with the matter of hand of: "Lots of people use EPEL (and other 3rd party repos). What can we do to make enabling those repos easier for our users?". Please let's not go off on this tangent. -Jeff
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list