[CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
Alan Bartlett
ajb at elrepo.orgFri Sep 14 16:05:46 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 14 September 2012 16:49, Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: >> If EPEL were to tag their RPM packages such that the package ownership >> is perfectly clear I would vote for (1). Unfortunately EPEL declines >> to tag their packages, so my vote is thus (3). > > > I think this has nothing to do with the matter of hand of: "Lots of > people use EPEL (and other 3rd party repos). What can we do to make > enabling those repos easier for our users?". > > Please let's not go off on this tangent. Not a tangent, Jeff, just an explanation of why my choice is what it is. Alan.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list