On 08/12/2014 12:09 PM, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jim Perrin" <jperrin at centos.org> >> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 5:06:18 PM >> Subject: [CentOS-devel] Distribution Artwork and logos. >> >> The two possible layouts I have in mind are: >> >> 1. exploded directory structure for the various source tarballs related >> to distro artwork such as centos-logos. >> >> 2. Named directory structures for the various image types. >> logos/{svg,png}, desktop/<resolution>/png, etc. >> > > I am leaning towards splitting things up into separate repositories or folders, maybe? > > 1. CentOS visual identity and logos have the authoritative source > files and colors etc defined in a separate repository, in SVG > format and perhaps certain bitmaps for most common uses. These files > are used for everything: distro artwork and any other promotional > material. > > .------------------------------------------------------------. > | I would keep this small, clear and logical so it's easy to | > | point people to the official logo files. | > `------------------------------------------------------------' > > 2. CentOS distro graphics, things that Alain has been working on. > > Maybe these should be organized per release, because things might > change between them, and scripts can evolve over time. These > folders would contain any release-specific artwork like wallpapers > and the motifs that might be used by the scripts. Also some files > might be just there as-is (like a custom wallpaper etc), while > others will be rendered by the scripts - depends on the case. > > 3. CentOS promotional material repository, tshirts, stickers and > everything else. > > By splitting these up we can avoid pointing people into a huge repository > with a lot of files, which is confusing, takes more time to clone, and > can lead to people using the wrong graphics even. > > I will need to think a bit to ponder the structure of each repository, > but my initial hunch is that it would make sense to split them by use: > > promotional -> brochures -> centos_for_the_win/ > promotional -> t-shirt -> 10-years/ > distribution -> seven -> common/flowertexture.png > distribution -> seven -> installer > > But lets see. We can of course do something first and change things when > we realize it doesnt work :-) This makes sense. Would you structure the 'seven' bits of the distribution as a branch in git, or would you prefer to keep releases as directories within the tree? Alain, is this a structure you could work with? -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77