On 08/13/2014 04:18 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 08/13/2014 03:19 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >> Hello all, >> I know I'm a tad late to the game but I'd like to express my >> intent to join the CentOS Atomic SIG. I don't know the process here >> but thought I'd throw it out there that I'd like to join. > > Awesome! Would love to have you on board. > Hi Adam ... welcome. >> I've been working on a number of packaging things out in the Fedora >> Atomic space as well as some efforts to package/rebuild for CentOS 7 >> (using EPEL7 build targets). >> >> So far I have contributed to work that's being done in the following locations: >> >> Packaging work, spec files, dependency spec files not yet in Fedora/EPEL, etc: >> https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package >> >> Project Atomic COPR builds for kubernetes and related packages: >> http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/walters/atomic-next/ >> >> RHEL7/CentOS7 (EPEL7) COPR builds for kubernetes and related packages: >> http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/maxamillion/epel7-kubernetes/ >> >> NOTE: The EPEL7 build is currently blocked due to an old version of >> docker in CentOS 7 (inhereted from RHEL) >> >> Whatever the next steps are to join please let me know, looking >> forward to the future of CentOS Atomic! Exciting stuff :) > > So the SIG page is here: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic > > To be "official" as a committer/steering committee member you need to be > approved by the others. We didn't actually define that process, though. > I'd like to suggest we just use lazy consensus and if you're doing work > on the project then we should add you as a committer as soon as we have > the repos defined. > > (Objections?) > I am actually not in this SIG, but I am monitoring it and interested in it ... FWIW, I think that is an excellent method (lazy consensus from the steering committee) to add new people. As a CentOS Board member, I can say that it is our objective to give the SIGs great latitude in creating their commit/access polices .. although we are still working through the ACL and Auth mechanisms to make that possible. I do expect something soon for that. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140814/70948f09/attachment-0007.sig>