[CentOS-devel] RFC: OCaml SIG
Jim Perrin
jperrin at centos.orgSat Dec 13 15:49:46 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RFC: OCaml SIG
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Storage SIG Meeting 12-Dec-2014 15:30 UTC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/11/2014 12:38 AM, Honza Horak wrote: > Ok, the hash may help in this case to avoid a false package is > installed. But isn't it still possible someone asks for just unversioned > provide (e.g. 'ocaml(Text)') and expects non-SCL package to be installed? It seems like everyone's willing to accept this(fix discussion vs acceptance discussion), so what should the repo be named and branched? -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RFC: OCaml SIG
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Storage SIG Meeting 12-Dec-2014 15:30 UTC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list