[CentOS-devel] RFC: OCaml SIG

On 12/11/2014 12:38 AM, Honza Horak wrote:

> Ok, the hash may help in this case to avoid a false package is
> installed. But isn't it still possible someone asks for just unversioned
> provide (e.g. 'ocaml(Text)') and expects non-SCL package to be installed?

It seems like everyone's willing to accept this(fix discussion vs
acceptance discussion), so what should the repo be named and branched?


-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77