-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/14 03:10, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 12:49:41AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Reviving an old thread here, I think we've got quite a lot of >> stuff going on around the project to benefit from a shared >> calendar solution. >> >> Do we have a way forward on this ? if not, we can try and just >> do something via a shared git repo or a hosted cal that can >> publish an ics file ? > > I don't have the whole earlier thread handy (curse you mailman and > your per-month archiving), but it'd be pretty great to collaborate > with Fedocal here. > And I guess it has a strong dependency on FAS ? (from what I can read on http://fedocal.readthedocs.org/en/latest/usage.html) There is already a thread about FAS vs IPA on the centos-devel list, about which one to target for the (near) future, but it seems it doesn't get momentum/traction ... (well, IPA seems the "prefered" choice, but no vote - yet - ) - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlR9cIoACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5OdwCeP2WMkoJnvsffaEu/cVL4kNI/ 40YAn0YJvsZcpKL+ReT9U/vqD9OEMhQi =x2vL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----